| What-If Analysis for First-Year Projections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The
following tables explore the variability of projected first-year operating
income (see M_IS worksheet) based on variations in sales |
|
|
|
| volumes,
sales prices, cost of sales and overhead expenses. They are automatically
updated whenever the Exl-Plan model is |
|
|
|
| recalculated.
To use this facility, first-year projections must be complete (but not
necessarily final). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table
1 - Calculated Operating Income ($000) for Year-Ending Dec 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variations in Sales Volumes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-15% |
-10% |
-5% |
Base |
+5% |
+10% |
+15% |
|
|
|
|
|
-15% |
-1,785.3 |
-1,751.9 |
-1,718.4 |
-1,685.0 |
-1,651.5 |
-1,618.0 |
-1,584.6 |
|
|
|
|
Variations |
-10% |
-1,614.2 |
-1,570.7 |
-1,527.1 |
-1,483.6 |
-1,440.1 |
-1,396.5 |
-1,353.0 |
|
|
|
|
in |
-5% |
-1,443.0 |
-1,389.4 |
-1,335.8 |
-1,282.2 |
-1,228.6 |
-1,175.0 |
-1,121.4 |
|
|
|
|
Sales |
Base |
-1,271.9 |
-1,208.2 |
-1,144.5 |
-1,080.9 |
-1,017.2 |
-953.5 |
-889.9 |
|
|
|
|
Prices |
+5% |
-1,100.7 |
-1,027.0 |
-953.2 |
-879.5 |
-805.8 |
-732.0 |
-658.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
+10% |
-929.5 |
-845.7 |
-761.9 |
-678.1 |
-594.3 |
-510.5 |
-426.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
+15% |
-758.4 |
-664.5 |
-570.6 |
-476.8 |
-382.9 |
-289.0 |
-195.1 |
|
|
|
|
Note: This analysis assumes that
cost of sales are fully variable and that overhead expenses |
|
|
|
|
remain fixed irrespective of any
sales volume changes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example of Interpretation: A 10%
reduction in sales volumes plus a 5% increase in sales prices |
|
|
|
|
could
result in an operating loss of 1027 ($000) as compared with the projected
base-case |
|
|
|
|
operating
loss of 1080.9 ($000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table
2 - Calculated Operating Income ($000) for Year-Ending Dec 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variations in Overhead Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+15% |
+10% |
+5% |
Base |
-5% |
-10% |
-15% |
|
|
|
|
|
+15% |
-1,805.5 |
-1,701.6 |
-1,597.8 |
-1,494.0 |
-1,390.1 |
-1,286.3 |
-1,182.4 |
|
|
|
|
Variations |
+10% |
-1,667.8 |
-1,563.9 |
-1,460.1 |
-1,356.3 |
-1,252.4 |
-1,148.6 |
-1,044.7 |
|
|
|
|
in |
+5% |
-1,530.1 |
-1,426.2 |
-1,322.4 |
-1,218.6 |
-1,114.7 |
-1,010.9 |
-907.0 |
|
|
|
|
Cost |
Base |
-1,392.4 |
-1,288.5 |
-1,184.7 |
-1,080.9 |
-977.0 |
-873.2 |
-769.3 |
|
|
|
|
of |
-5% |
-1,254.7 |
-1,150.8 |
-1,047.0 |
-943.2 |
-839.3 |
-735.5 |
-631.6 |
|
|
|
|
Sales |
-10% |
-1,117.0 |
-1,013.1 |
-909.3 |
-805.5 |
-701.6 |
-597.8 |
-493.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
-15% |
-979.3 |
-875.4 |
-771.6 |
-667.8 |
-563.9 |
-460.1 |
-356.2 |
|
|
|
|
Note: This analysis assumes that
cost of sales and overhead expenses can be varied without any |
|
|
|
|
knock-on effects or consequences. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example of Interpretation: A 10%
reduction in overhead expenses could improve base-case |
|
|
|
|
operating
income by 207.7 ($000). In contrast, a 10% reduction in cost of sales could
improve |
|
|
|
|
operating
income by 275.4 ($000). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|