Blog Home  Bookmark and Share

Questions about Nama

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Four questions about Nama:

  1. Why is the onus on Irish taxpayers to recapitalise the main banks via Nama? These banks could raise substantial capital by selling off non-core investment and insurance activities and holdings in banks in the UK, Poland and the US. 

  2. Why is the Minister preoccupied with the capital requirements of the banks when determining the haircut on loans being transferred to Nama? Surely, this amounts to match-fixing with taxpayers on the losing team.

  3. Will the Minister accept that property values could continue falling for the next few years and might not rise for several years thereafter? This would be a consequence of the overhang created by Nama's portfolio, rising interest rates and ultra-conservative bank lending.

  4. Why doesn't the Government direct the banks to grant share options to mortgage holders experiencing negative equity? This would help compensate them for the failures by the Government, Regulator and banks to exercise judgement and prudential control during the boom which they provoked.

Lead letter published in the Irish Times on 17th September 2009.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.planware.org/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/bf/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/130

Leave a comment

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 4.25

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian published on September 16, 2009 9:18 AM.

Say Sorry & Resign was the previous entry in this blog.

Who are Government & Nama Trying to Fool? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Top of Page